midpage

CINTRON

Board of Immigration Appeals
Jul 1, 1976
ID 2528
Versions:16 I. & N. Dec. 9

Decided by Board September 3, 1976

The United States citizen petitioner submitted a letter to the District Director requesting that the visa petition filed to accord his spouse immediate relative classification be withdrawn. The letter request was acknowledged by the District Director, but he subsequently ordered the petition denied. In view of the petitioner‘s letter request that the petition be withdrawn, the denial by the District Director was erroneous, and it is the order of the Board that the record reflect that the petition was withdrawn by petitioner.

ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: Fried, Fragomen & Del Rey, P.C.
515 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10022

The United States citizen petitioner filed a visa petition in behalf of the beneficiary as his spouse under section 201(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. He subsequently submitted a letter withdrawing the petition. In a decision dated October 9, 1975, the District Director acknowledged having received the letter withdrawing the petition but nevertheless ordered the petition be denied. The petitioner has appealed from the District Director‘s decision refusing to consider the petition withdrawn. The appeal will be sustained.

Just as any United States citizen or lawful permanent resident may file a visa petition in behalf of an alien, so may he withdraw the petition before a decision has been rendered. The action of the District Director in refusing to consider the petition withdrawn was erroneous. Accordingly, we shall sustain the appeal and order the record to reflect that the petition has been withdrawn.

ORDER: The appeal is sustained; the visa petition filed by the petitioner in behalf of the beneficiary has been withdrawn.

Case Details

Case Name: CINTRON
Court Name: Board of Immigration Appeals
Date Published: Jul 1, 1976
Citations: 16 I. & N. Dec. 9; ID 2528
Docket Number: ID 2528
Court Abbreviation: BIA
Log In