History
  • No items yet
midpage
804 F.2d 837
4th Cir.
1986
PER CURIAM:

On rehearing of this appeal en banc, the judgment of the district court is affirmed for reasons stated in the dissent to the superseded panel decision. See Cincinnati Milacron, Ltd. v. M/V American Legend, 784 F.2d 1161, 1166 (4th Cir.1986) (dissenting opinion).

Chief Judge Winter and Judge Ervin dissent and would reverse for reasons stated in the superseded opinion for the panel majority. See id. at 1162.

AFFIRMED.

Case Details

Case Name: Cincinnati Milacron, Ltd. v. M/v American Legend, Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and United States Lines, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 6, 1986
Citations: 804 F.2d 837; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33195; 1987 A.M.C. 282; 85-1183
Docket Number: 85-1183
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In