History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. McCollum
245 U.S. 632
SCOTUS
1917
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Melton, 218 U. S. 36, 52, 53; Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61, 78; Mutual Loan Co. v. Martell, 222 U. S. 225, 235; St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Ry. Co. v. Arkansas, 240 U. S. 518.

Case Details

Case Name: Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. McCollum
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Nov 26, 1917
Citation: 245 U.S. 632
Docket Number: No. 57
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In