History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cincinnati Goodwill Industries v. Neuerman
130 Ohio St. 334
Ohio
1935
Check Treatment

It appears from the record that the trial court overruled motions of the defendant for a directed verdict, as well as a motion for judgment contra verdict, and granted a motion for a new trial. Thereupon defendant prosecuted error to the Court of Appeals, which dismissed the petition in error and cross-petition in error for the reason that there was no judgment or final order in the Court of Common Pleas.

The Court of Appeals granted an order to certify the record on the ground of conflict with Toney v. Jenkins, 47 Ohio App. 248, 191 N.E. 828, and Union Gas Electric Co. v. Hill,49 Ohio App. 20, 194 N.E. 884. *Page 335

On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of said Court of Appeals be, and the same hereby is, reversed and the cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for the reason that the action of the trial court in overruling the motions of defendant for a directed verdict and for judgment contra verdict and granting the motion for a new trial constituted a final order from which error may be prosecuted. Therefore the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction. Jacob LaubBaking Co. v. Middleton, 118 Ohio St. 106, 160 N.E. 629;Chris Holl Hardware Co. v. Logan Brick Supply Co., 84 Ohio St. 455, 95 N.E. 1144; Davis v. Turner, 69 Ohio St. 101,68 N.E. 819.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

STEPHENSON, JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.

WILLIAMS, J., dissents.

Case Details

Case Name: Cincinnati Goodwill Industries v. Neuerman
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 26, 1935
Citation: 130 Ohio St. 334
Docket Number: 25516
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.