History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Pyatt
80 Ohio St. 3d 191
Ohio
1997
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Based upon the record before us and the findings of the board with respect to respondent’s failure to respond to relator’s inquiries, we conclude that respondent not only has failed to cooperate in a disciplinary investigation, but also has failed to maintain his good standing with this court both by failing to register with the Clerk of Court for the current biennium, as required by Gov.Bar R. VI, and by failing to advise the Clerk of his current office address as required by Gov.Bar R. VI(1)(D).

We therefore adopt the recommendation of the board and indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs of these proceedings are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Pyatt
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 5, 1997
Citation: 80 Ohio St. 3d 191
Docket Number: No. 97-872
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.