History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Fehler-Schultz
64 Ohio St. 3d 452
Ohio
1992
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and agree with the board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. We also agree with the board’s recommendation and are not persuaded by respondent’s objections thereto. Thus, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, consistent with the board’s recommendation. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Fehler-Schultz
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Sep 2, 1992
Citation: 64 Ohio St. 3d 452
Docket Number: No. 92-417
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.