History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Ebel
5 Ohio St. 3d 145
Ohio
1983
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

After a careful examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings and conclusions of the board that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), DR 6-101(A)(3) and DR 7-101(A)(2) and (3).

It is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Ebel
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 8, 1983
Citation: 5 Ohio St. 3d 145
Docket Number: D.D. No. 83-11
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.