64 Ohio St. 3d 452
Ohio
1992
Per Curiam.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and agree with the board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. We also agree with the board’s recommendation and are not persuaded by respondent’s objections thereto. Thus, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, consistent with the board’s recommendation. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.