History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Wang
59 Ohio St. 3d 67
Ohio
1991
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and in its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Wang
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 24, 1991
Citation: 59 Ohio St. 3d 67
Docket Number: No. 90-2534
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.