History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Grote
553 N.E.2d 657
Ohio
1990
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

We agree that respondent violated DR. 1-102(A)(4) and 6-101(A)(3). However, we find respondent’s misconduct deserving of a more severe sanction than that recommended by the board. Accordingly, respondent is hereby ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Grote
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 18, 1990
Citation: 553 N.E.2d 657
Docket Number: No. 89-2164
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In