Cilente v. CilenteCilente v. Cilente
After hearing, the defendant was found guilty of extreme cruelty and a decree of divorce was ordered. Before the decree was entered the petitioner and a former sweetheart guiltily went through a form of marriage ceremony in New York.
The petitioner is guilty of bigamy, a grave offense, against the public of the State of New York, but she has not violated her marriage contract, yet undissolved, or wronged her husband of which he can complain. Bigamy or any other criminal act short of one the ground for divorce is not a subject of recrimination. If the petitioner had committed murder or robbery or any other heinous crime, surely it could not be heard to bar her of divorce. A right to a divorce cannot be defeated by recrimination unless the petitioner be guilty of a matrimonial offense which would entitle the defendant to a decree were he not guilty. Bish. Div. § 92; Adams v. Adams, 17 N.J. Eq. 324; Rapp v. Rapp, 67 N.J. Eq. 236; Rogers v. Rogers, 81 N.J. Eq. 479; Epley v. Epley, 83 N.J. Eq. 214; Young v. Young, 94 N.J. Eq. 155.
A decree nisi will be entered.