Cikora v. State, 450 So. 2d 351

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction because no reversible error was made to appear. As to the order revoking probation, four violations were claimed. We record that the first alleged violation, attempted burglary of the home of Florence Jarboe, was unsupported by record evidence and, thus, was not proven. However, the three remaining alleged violations were proven and furnish adequate support for the revocation.

Affirmed.

GLICKSTEIN, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Cikora v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: May 30, 1984

Citations: 450 So. 2d 351; 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13241; Nos. 83-1341, 83-1357

Docket Number: Nos. 83-1341, 83-1357

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.