History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chung v. Ladybug Skincare of Houston, Texas
4:11-cv-04079
S.D. Tex.
Oct 2, 2012
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 4:11-cv-04079 Document 72 Filed in TXSD on 10/02/12 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

HELENE CHUNG, § §

Plaintiff, § §

V. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-11-4079 §

LADYBUG SKINCARE SALON OF § HOUSTON, TEXAS, VIVIAN PAI, and §

RADIANCY, INC . , § §

Defendants. § ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending is Defendants Ladybug Skincare Salon of Houston, Texas' and Vivian Pails Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 54) and

Defendant Radiancy, Inc. ' s Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 55) .

The Court has received from the Magistrate Judge a Memorandum and

Recommendation recommending that Defendant Radiancy, 1 n c . l ~ Motion

to Dismiss (Document No. 55) be GRANTED and that Defendants Ladybug

Skincare Salon of Houston, Texasr and Vivian Pails Motion to

Dismiss (Document No. 54) be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

Defendants Ladybug Skincare Salon of Houston, Texas and Vivian Pai

have filed Objections (Document No. 71) to the Memorandum and

Recommendation. The Court, after having made a de novo review of

the motions to dismiss, the Memorandum and Recommendation, and the

objections, is of the opinion that the findings and recommendations

of the Magistrate Judge are correct and should be and hereby are

accepted by the Court in their entirety. Accordingly,

Case 4:11-cv-04079 Document 72 Filed in TXSD on 10/02/12 Page 2 of 2 It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge

filed on September 13, 2012, which is adopted in its entirety as

the opinion of this Court, that Defendant Radiancy, 1 n c . l ~ Motion

to Dismiss (Document No. 55) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims of

negligence, violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act,

fraud, and strict/products liability against Defendant Radiancy,

Inc. are DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 12(b) (6) for failure to state

a claim; Defendants' Ladybug Skincare Salon of Houston, Texas' and

Vivian Pail s Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 54) is GRANTED in PART

and DENIED in PART, and Plaintiff's claims of fraud, violations of

the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act and strict/products

liability against Defendants Ladybug Skincare Salon of Houston,

Texas, and Vivian Pai are DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 12 (b) (6) for

failure to state a claim.

The Clerk will enter this Order and send copies to all parties of record.

Signed at Houston, Texas this 2*( day of d'dbCC& , 2012 1 UNITED SIM AK STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case Details

Case Name: Chung v. Ladybug Skincare of Houston, Texas
Court Name: District Court, S.D. Texas
Date Published: Oct 2, 2012
Docket Number: 4:11-cv-04079
Court Abbreviation: S.D. Tex.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.