No. 780 | SCOTUS | Jan 6, 1947

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Nebbia v. New York, 291 U.S. 502" date_filed="1934-03-05" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Nebbia v. New York">291 U. S. 502; Olsen v. Nebraska, 313 U.S. 236" date_filed="1941-04-28" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Olsen v. Nebraska Ex Rel. Western Reference & Bond Assn., Inc.">313 U. S. 236. (2) Associated Press v. Labor Board, 301 U.S. 103" date_filed="1937-04-12" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Associated Press v. National Labor Relations Board">301 U. S. 103; Associated Press v. United States, 326 U.S. 1" date_filed="1945-10-08" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Associated Press v. United States">326 U. S. 1. Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Murphy, and Mr. Justice Rutledge are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.