History
  • No items yet
midpage
Christus Spohn Health System Corporation, D/B/A Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi - Shoreline v. Anita H. Sosa, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Shawna Lee Sosa
13-16-00578-CV
| Tex. App. | Mar 2, 2017
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 NUMBER 13-16-00578-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ CHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH

SYSTEM CORPORATION D/B/A

CHRISTUS SPOHN HOSPITAL

CORPUS CHRISTI - SHORELINE,

Appellant, v.

ANITA H. SOSA, INDIVIDUALLY

AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF

THE ESTATE OF

SHAWNA LEE SOSA, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Hinojosa Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa

Appellant, Christus Spohn Health System Corporation d/b/a Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi – Shoreline, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas in cause number 2014-DCV-0727-C. This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying appellant’s plea to the jurisdiction taken pursuant to section 51.014(a)(8) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See T EX . C IV . P RAC . & R EM . C ODE A NN . § 51.014(a)(8) (West, Westlaw through 2015 R.S.). On January 20, 2017, this appeal was abated to allow the parties an opportunity to effectuate a settlement agreement. Appellant has now filed an unopposed motion requesting that we reinstate this appeal, and then dismiss the appeal based on the parties’ agreement. Appellant states that it will be responsible for its costs of appeal.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the unopposed motion to reinstate and dismiss this appeal, is of the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we reinstate this cause and dismiss the appeal based on the parties’ agreement. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

LETICIA HINOJOSA Justice Delivered and filed the

2nd day of March, 2017.

2

Case Details

Case Name: Christus Spohn Health System Corporation, D/B/A Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi - Shoreline v. Anita H. Sosa, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Shawna Lee Sosa
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Mar 2, 2017
Docket Number: 13-16-00578-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.