146 So. 881 | Ala. | 1933
The bill seeks reformation of description in a mortgage and its foreclosure. No fraud is charged and the reformation rests upon the theory of a mutual mistake. Its sufficiency in this respect is the only matter here presented.
We recognize the rule, as noted by appellant's counsel, requiring particularity of averment in cases of this character (Webb v. Sprott,
The decree is correct, and will accordingly be here affirmed.
Affirmed.
ANDERSON, C. J., and BOULDIN and FOSTER, JJ., concur.