History
  • No items yet
midpage
Christie v. Broussard
308 U.S. 514
SCOTUS
1939
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss! is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. McGrew, 188 U. S. 291, 308; Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Home for Incurables v. City of New York, 187 U. S. 155, 158; (2) Roberts v. City of New York, 295 U. S. 264, 278; Seattle Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U. S. 568, 570; Cross Lake Shooting & Fishing Club v. Louisiana, 224 U. S. 632, 638; Ross v. Oregon, 227 U. S. 150, 162.

Case Details

Case Name: Christie v. Broussard
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Nov 6, 1939
Citation: 308 U.S. 514
Docket Number: No. 458
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.