45 S.E.2d 201 | Ga. | 1947
The act of 1943 (Ga. L. 1943, p. 588), providing for additional compensation for sheriffs, in counties having a population of not more than 12,210 and not less than 12,190 according to the Federal Census of 1940 or any future census, because of extra duties by reason of national defense, with a provision that it become ineffective six months after the duration of the present World War, is a special law for which provision has been made under existing laws and is violative of art 1, sec. 4, par. 1, of the Constitution of 1877 (Code, § 2-401).
In his answer the commissioner asserted that the act was unconstitutional, in that it was a special law enacted solely for the benefit of the Sheriff of Catoosa County (and this court will take cognizance of the fact that by the census of 1940, Catoosa is the only county coming within the designated figures), and that compensation for sheriffs was provided for under existing general laws codified in the Code, §§ 24-2822, 24-2823, and was therefore in violation of art. 1, sec. 4, par. 1 (Code, § 2-401) of the Constitution of 1877.
A demurrer to this answer was sustained, an order was taken granting the prayers of the petition, and the commissioner excepted.
The act in question having been passed in 1943, its validity must be determined by the Constitution of 1877. If unconstitutional then, it is forever void. Jones v. McCaskill,
The provision of the Constitution of 1877 here involved is art. 1, sec. 4, par. 1 (Code, § 2-401), to wit: "Laws of a general nature shall have uniform operation throughout the State, and no special law shall be enacted in any case for which provision has been made by an existing general law."
In Chappell v. Kilgore,
This act being applicable only in counties having a population of not more than 12,210 and not less than 12,190 according to the Federal Census of 1940 and any future Federal Census, and the answer — which upon demurrer must be taken as true — asserting that the "act is a special law enacted solely for the benefit of the Sheriff of Catoosa County," it is a special act under the rulings in Worth County v. Crisp County,
Accordingly, the court erred in sustaining a demurrer to the answer of the commissioner.
Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur, except Head, J.,disqualified, and Wyatt, J., who took no part in theconsideration or decision of this case.