Chrisomalides v. EkowChrisomalides v. Ekow
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered August 28, 2000, which denied appellants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that such motion was made more than 120 days subsequent to plaintiffs’ filing of their note of issue, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to grant appellants’ motion insofar as to dismiss the claims of plaintiffs Andrew and Paressa Kountotsis, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Appellants’ motion, plainly meritorious with respect to the claims of the Kountotsis plaintiffs, should have been reviewed on the merits in the interest of judicial economy and granted insofar as it sought dismissal of the Kountotsis claims (see, Brunetti v City of New York,
Plaintiff Christos Chrisomalides, on the other hand, did submit sworn medical evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue as to whether he suffered “serious injur/’ in the subject accident and, accordingly, we affirm the denial of summary judgment with respect to his claims and the derivative claim of his wife (see, Randazzo v Our Lady of Mercy Med. Ctr.,