History
  • No items yet
midpage
Choice v. State
29 Ga. App. 215
Ga. Ct. App.
1922
Check Treatment
Bloodworth, J.

The special grounds of the motion for a new tri&l are but amplifications of the general grounds; the evidence amply supports the verdict, no error of law appears, and the trial judge properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. Charles W. Worrill, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, R. R. Arnold, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Choice v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 14, 1922
Citation: 29 Ga. App. 215
Docket Number: 13923
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.