History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chiles v. Straw
66 Fla. 48
Fla.
1913
Check Treatment
Whitfield, J.

The appellee brought suit to enforce the specific performance of a contract made for the sale of a stock of merchandise and a mercantile business in exchange or payment for an orange grove, there being mutal agreements as to assuming and discharging existing claims of creditors and as to transferring securities in accomplishing the transaction. An injunction was also prayed.

The allegations of the bill of complaint and the prayers clearly indicate that the remedy at law is not adequate, and without expressing an opinion as to the relief that should be granted if the allegations are duly proven, equity appears to be in the allegations, therefore, no error was committed in overruling a general demurrer to *49the bill of complaint from which order this appeal was taken.

Affirmed.

Shackleford, O. J., and Taylor, Cockrell and Hocker, J. J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Chiles v. Straw
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Jun 25, 1913
Citation: 66 Fla. 48
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.