midpage

Childs v. StateChilds v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 17, 1995
1941730
Versions:671 So. 2d 783
1995 Ala. LEXIS 434
1995 WL 683862

Lead Opinion

BUTTS, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

ALMON, SHORES, KENNEDY, and INGRAM, JJ., concur. HOOPER, C. J., and MADDOX and HOUSTON, JJ., dissent.





Dissenting Opinion

MADDOX, Justice

(dissenting).

I would issue the writ in this case and review the record in light of some of the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in the last decade relating to the rights of the police, based upon reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, to make an investigative stop and to conduct a search, especially if there was a consent to search, which the State says was present in this case. By voting to issue the writ to review the question, I should not be understood as saying that I believe that the State would, or should, ultimately prevail.

HOOPER, C.J., and HOUSTON, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Childs v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Nov 17, 1995
Citations: 671 So. 2d 783; 1995 Ala. LEXIS 434; 1995 WL 683862; 1941730
Docket Number: 1941730
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
Log In