History
  • No items yet
midpage
Childress v. Peterson
40 Cal. App. 2d 590
Cal. Ct. App.
1940
Check Treatment
MARKS, Acting P. J.

This is a motion to dismiss this appeal because appellants' opening brief was not filed within the time provided by section 4 of rule I of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.

Our record shows that the cleik’s and reporter's transcripts were filed on June 22, 1940. On August 19, 1940, respondents filed their notice of motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellants ’ opening brief was filed on the same day. This has been held a sufficient answer to the motion to dismiss. (Toth v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 113 Cal. App. 55 [297 Pac. 564] ; North v. Evans, 114 Cal. App. 714 [300 Pac. 893] ; Lisle v. Ragle, 10 Cal. App. (2d) 758 [52 Pac. (2d) 608] ; Hall v. Wolford, 22 Cal. App. (2d) 537 [71 Pac. (2d) 596].)

The motion is denied.

Griffin, J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Childress v. Peterson
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Sep 12, 1940
Citation: 40 Cal. App. 2d 590
Docket Number: Civ. No. 2715
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.