midpage

Children's Hosp. Med. Ctr. v. TomaikoChildren's Hosp. Med. Ctr. v. Tomaiko

Ohio Court of Appeals, 11th District
Dec 30, 2011
2011-P-0103
Versions:2011-Ohio-6838

David A. Sed, 269 West Main Street, P.O. Box 672, Ravenna, OH 44266 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

Jeffrey G. Tomaiko, pro se, 1901 Meadowlark Drive, Mogadore, OH 44260 (Defendant-Appellant).

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DIANE V. GRENDELL, J.

{¶1} On December 8, 2011, appellant, Jeffrey G. Tomaiko, pro se, filed a notice of appeal with this court from an October 4, 2011 judgment of the Portage County Municipal Court, Ravenna Division.

{¶2} In the October 4, 2011 entry, the trial court adopted the magistrate‘s decision and ordered that no further discovery be conducted and that the case be set for trial. It is from that entry that appellant filed his notice of appeal.

{¶3} Section 3(B)(2), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution limits the jurisdiction of an appellate court to the review of final judgments of lower courts. Germ v. Fuerst, 11th Dist. No. 2003-L-116, 2003-Ohio-6241, ¶3. In order for a judgment to be final and appealable, the requirements of R.C. 2505.02 and Civ.R. 54(B), if applicable, must be satisfied. See Geauga Cty. Treasurer v. Segedy, 11th Dist. No. 2009-G-2907, 2009-Ohio-3941, citing Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ. (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 86, 88.

{¶4} Pursuant to R.C. 2505.02(B), there are seven categories of a “final order,” and if a trial court‘s judgment satisfies any of them, it will be considered a “final order” which can be immediately appealed and reviewed by a court of appeals.

{¶5} Here, the trial court‘s October 4, 2011 order does not fit within any of the categories of R.C. 2505.02. The trial court simply ordered that no further discovery shall take place and that the matter be set for trial. Therefore, the entry appealed from is an interlocutory order and is not final. This appeal has been filed prematurely. Appellant will have a meaningful and effective remedy by means of an appeal once a final judgment is reached as to all claims and parties when the case is decided and/or dismissed. See Johnson v. Warren Police Dept., 11th Dist. No. 2005-T-0117, 2005-Ohio-6904, at ¶14.

{¶6} Thus, this appeal is hereby, sua sponte, dismissed as prematurely filed.

{¶7} Appeal dismissed.

CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J.,

MARY JANE TRAPP, J.,

concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Children's Hosp. Med. Ctr. v. Tomaiko
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals, 11th District
Date Published: Dec 30, 2011
Citations: 2011-Ohio-6838; 2011-P-0103
Docket Number: 2011-P-0103
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App. 11th
Log In