CHIEN
The case comes forward pursuant to certification by the special inquiry officer of his decision dated August 2, 1963 ordering that the deportation of the respоndent be suspended under the provisions of section 244(a) (1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended.
Discussion as to Deportability: The respondent is a native and citizen of China, 32 years old, male, who last entered the United States on September 19, 1954, at which time he was admitted as a nonimmigrant student. His status was changed on May 8, 1959 to that of an exchange visitor and he was subsequently granted until July 16, 1963 to effect his voluntary departure from the Unitеd States. On December 28, 1962 the grant of voluntary departure was rescinded and the respondent acknowledged that he has remained in the United States thereafter without authority. Deportability is conceded and is found to be established as charged in the order to show cause.
Discussion as to Eligibility for Suspension of Deportation: The respondent was married on April 7, 1957. His wife had entered the United States on November 3, 1956 as an exchange visitor and is the bеneficiary of a waiver of the two-year foreign residence requirement. They have two children, approximately four and two years of age, both native-born citizens of the United States. The respondent‘s wife is a pediatrician but is presently active only as a housewife. She and the children are dependent entirely upon the
Letters from professional associates and friends, reprints of respondent‘s articles in various scientific publications and other documentary evidence have been submitted. This evidence establishes that the respondent has been continuously physically present in the United States since the time of еntry, a period of at least the preceding seven years.
A check of the local appropriate local and federal records have failed to reveal an arrest or criminal record against the respondent. Inquiry disclosed that he has no connection with subversive groups. Affidavits of witnesses and an independent character investigation establish that he has been a person of good moral character for more than the preceding seven years. The respondent meets the good moral character requirement for suspension of depоrtation as well as the other requirement of a continuous period of residence of not less than seven years immediately preceding the date of his application, and the requiremеnt that his deportation would result in extreme hardship to himself as well as his spouse and children, the latter of whom are citizens of the United States.
The respondent is the beneficiary of a visa petition filed in his behalf by Columbia University on June 11, 1962 approved by the Service on July 18, 1962 granting him preference status under section 203(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. At the request of the Department of Defense, bаsed upon his research in the field of hemorrhagic shock and radiation syndrome for the Office of the Army Surgeon General, he has been granted a waiver of the foreign residence requirement fоr exchange visitors under section 212(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. However, since the first preference portion of the quota for Chinese persons is oversubscribed presently, the respondent cannot readily obtain an immigrant visa to otherwise adjust his immigration status.
The respondent‘s case is an extremely meritorious one and he qualifies for suspension of deportation in every respect except for the apparent bar interposed by section 244(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act as amended by the Act of October 24, 1962 (76 Stat. 1247, P.L. 87-885) which provides:
(f) No provision of this sectiоn shall be applicable to an alien who * * * (2) was admitted to the United States pursuant to section 101(a) (15) (J) or has acquired such status after admission to the United States; * * *
The primary purpose of the Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 was to promote international good will by mutual exchange of persons to observe and study on the one hand and to teach important knowledge on the other. In establishing this program Congress anticipated that the alien would employ the knowledge and skill, thus aсquired as the result of a stay here, in his own country. He was declared ineligible for the privilege of suspension of deportation. The ban against granting suspension of deportation to exchange visitors was incorporated into section 402(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 was amended on June 4, 1956 (Public Law 84-555) to provide that no person acquiring exchange status thereafter would be eligible for an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence unless he had been physically present in a сooperating country for a period of two years following departure from the United States, except that such two-year requirement might be waived by the Attorney General in the case of an alien whose admission to the United States was found by the Attorney General to be in the public interest.
Section 201 of the Information and Educational Exchange Act was repealed by the Mutual Exchangе and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961 (Public Law 87-256) and the two-year foreign residence requirement and waiver provisions in somewhat revised form were incorporated into section 212(e) of the Immigration and Nаtionality Act and section 101(a) (15) (J) was added to include exchange visitors as a specific category of nonimmigrants. Although section 244(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act as amended on October 24, 1962 at first glance would also appear to bar voluntary departure to the classes of aliens enumerated therein, such a construction was rejected in favor of an interpretation аllowing such relief in the cases of crewmen.1
In commenting on the proposed amendment of section 244 by the Act of October 24, 1962 the Congressional discussion as stated by Congressman Feighan stated as fоllows: “Suspension of deportation will not be available to alien crewmen and to persons who come to
Suspension of deportation is a remedial provision and any аmbiguity in the restriction of the grant of such relief should be resolved in favor of the alien. The respondent has been granted a waiver of the two-year foreign residence period required of one who acquired the status of an exchange visitor. Inasmuch as he is no longer required to return to his native country for two years, having been granted the necessary waiver, he would appear to bе eligible for suspension of deportation and the bar of section 244(f) (2) would not apply in such a case. The order of the special inquiry officer granting the respondent the privilege of suspеnsion of deportation under section 244(a) (1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act will be approved.
ORDER: It is ordered that the order of the special inquiry officer dated August 2, 1963 granting the alien the privilege of suspension of deportation be and the same is hereby approved.