| Tex. | Jul 1, 1852
In this case there was no assignment of error, as required by law. The appellee argues some of the questions raised on the exceptions taken in the court below, but presents also the ground that errors in the judgment, for want of assignment, have been waived. This may be considered'‘as a motion on his part to dismiss for the want, of an assignment of errors, and this is accordingly granted.
Appeal dismissed.