History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chester v. King
2 N.J. Eq. 405
New York Court of Chancery
1841
Check Treatment
The Chancellor.

The mortgagor who has parted with the ¡equity of redemption is not a necessary party to a bill for foreclosure ; but if the complainant thinks proper to make him a party, ihe has a right so to do, and the bill is not demurrable for that .cause. He is a proper party, although not an indispensable one.

Demurrer overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Chester v. King
Court Name: New York Court of Chancery
Date Published: Apr 15, 1841
Citation: 2 N.J. Eq. 405
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.