Chester v. King
2 N.J. Eq. 405 | New York Court of Chancery | 1841
The mortgagor who has parted with the ¡equity of redemption is not a necessary party to a bill for foreclosure ; but if the complainant thinks proper to make him a party, ihe has a right so to do, and the bill is not demurrable for that .cause. He is a proper party, although not an indispensable one.
Demurrer overruled.
