Chestang v. HobbsChestang v. Hobbs
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS MOOT.
PER CURIAM
On January 25, 2011, appellant Ke’ondra Montrel Chestang, an inmate incarcerated in the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC) at a facility in Lincoln County, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Lincoln County Circuit Court. The court denied the petition, and appellant lodged an appeal from the order in this court.
On July 28, 2011, appellant filed the motions that are now before us, seeking an order directing the circuit clerk in Lincoln County to provide him with certain documents for the addendum to his brief and an extension of time in which to file the brief. His address on the motions reflected that he had been transferred to an ADC facility located in Jefferson County.
We do not reach the merits of the motions and dismiss the appeal because the Lincoln County Circuit Court can no longer grant the relief requested by appellant. Waller v. Norris, 2011 Ark. 168 (per curiam); Buckhanna v. Hobbs, 2011 Ark. 119 (per curiam). An appeal of the denial of postconviction relief, including an appeal from an order that denied a petition for writ of
Any petition for writ of habeas corpus to effect the release of a prisoner is properly addressed to the circuit court in the county in which the prisoner is held in custody.1 By the time appellant filed the instant motions, he was in custody in Jefferson County, where he is currently incarcerated. The records of the Department of Correction verify the change in location.
A circuit court does not have jurisdiction to release on a writ of habeas corpus a prisoner not in custody in that court’s jurisdiction. Waller, 2011 Ark. 168; Buckhanna, 2011 Ark. 119; Hill v. State, 2010 Ark. 102 (per curiam); Pardue v. State, 338 Ark. 606, 999 S.W.2d 198 (1999) (per curiam) (citing Mackey v. Lockhart, 307 Ark. 321, 819 S.W.2d 702 (1991)). Even if appellant’s petition had merit, and the circuit court erred in dismissing it, appellant cannot now prevail on appeal. Waller, 2011 Ark. 168; Buckhanna, 2011 Ark. 119. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, and the motions are moot.
Appeal dismissed; motions moot.