History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cheshire v. Wright
243 N.C. 441
N.C.
1956
Check Treatment
Pee CtjRiam.

The jury, under application of settled principles of law, resolved the issues of fact against the defendants. While the appellant’s well-prepared brief presents contentions involving fine distinctions and close differentiations, a careful examination of the assignments of error discloses no new question or feature requiring extended discussion. Neither reversible nor prejudicial error has been made to appear. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Case Details

Case Name: Cheshire v. Wright
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jan 13, 1956
Citation: 243 N.C. 441
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.