Cherry v. StateCherry v. State
In the instant case the appellant unsuccessfully sought relief on the basis of a claim that his sentence was of illegal duration under the Youthful Offender Act. The trial court failed to furnish to this court the record as described in rule 9.140(g), even after an order to show cause was issued.
The state attempted to bridge the gap by filing copies of the appropriate documents. However, the state cannot cure the trial court‘s failure to comply with the requirement of rule 9.140(g). Wheeler v. State, 634 So.2d 213 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Jackson v. State, 602 So.2d 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); McGrady v. State, 591 So.2d 270 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
GLICKSTEIN, GUNTHER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.