midpage

Cherry v. Hofstra UniversityCherry v. Hofstra University

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Jul 17, 2000
Versions:274 A.D.2d 443
711 N.Y.S.2d 898
2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7857

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated November 3, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff was injured during lacrosse practice when he ran into a bench which was located on the side of the defendant’s playing field. The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The bench was an open and obvious condition which could “readily be observed by those employing the reasonable use of their senses” (Paulo v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 233 AD2d 380). In opposition to the defendant’s establishment of a prima facie case, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Bracken, J. P., Joy, Thompson and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Cherry v. Hofstra University
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 17, 2000
Citations: 274 A.D.2d 443; 711 N.Y.S.2d 898; 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7857
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In