JIAN REN CHEN, Appellant, v CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York
881 N.Y.S.2d 332
Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Belen and Hall, JJ.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
A jury verdict “should be set aside as against the weight of the evidence only when it could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence” (Shaw v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 5 AD3d 468, 468 [2004]). The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff’s motion, in effect, pursuant to
Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the jury’s award of damages was not inadequate (see Gutierrez v City of New York, 288 AD2d 86 [2001]). The plaintiff’s proof on the issue of his alleged damages was minimal and conclusory.
Moreover, under the facts of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff’s motion for an award of an attorney’s fee pursuant to the Civil Rights Act (see
The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review, are without merit, or need not be reached in light of our determination. Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Belen and Hall, JJ., concur. [See 18 Misc 3d 161.]
