History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chemical Engineering Services, Inc. v. Tomlinson
750 S.W.2d 375
Tex. App.
1988
Check Treatment

OPINION

DIES, Chief Justice.

In the trial court, Appellee John R. Tom-linson, as Plaintiff, sued Appellant Chemical Engineering Services, Inc. d/b/a Dril-pac Management, for money allegedly owed by Drilpac to Tomlinson pursuant to an assignment of a mineral lease from Tomlinson to Drilpac and an operating agreement to which Tomlinson and Drilpac were parties. In a contested preliminary hearing to the court, the court appointed Tomlinson as receiver, and Drilpac has perfected appeal to this court. Appellant has filed a brief, but Appellee has not.

TEX.CIVPRAC. & REM.CODE ANN sec. 64.021 (Vernon 1986) provides in part:

“(a) To be appointed as a receiver for property that is located entirely or partly in this state, a person must:
* * * * * ♦
“(2) not be a party, attorney, or other person interested in the action for appointment of a receiver.”

It is obvious that this statute disqualifies Appellee from being appointed receiver. Appellant’s sole point of error is sustained. The order of the trial court is reversed and vacated.

Reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Chemical Engineering Services, Inc. v. Tomlinson
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: May 5, 1988
Citation: 750 S.W.2d 375
Docket Number: No. 09-87-207 CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.