History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
317 U.S. 588
SCOTUS
1942
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

In No. 160 the appeal is dismissed, and ‍​​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​​​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‍in No. 169 the petition for writ of *589certiorari is denied, for want of a final judgment. Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Coats-Fordney Co., 243 U. S. 251; Wick v. Superior Court, 278 U. S. 575.

Mr. George Henry Huft for appellant in No. 160 and respondent in No. 169. Mr. Thomas A. Foulke for Benjamin H. Davis et al., appellees in No. 160. Messrs. Claude T. Reno, Harry M. ‍​​‌​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​​​​​​​​​​​​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‍Showalter, Samuel Graff Miller, and Herbert S. Levy for the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

Case Details

Case Name: Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 12, 1942
Citation: 317 U.S. 588
Docket Number: No. 160; No. 169
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.