History
  • No items yet
midpage
84 Ohio St. 3d 534
Ohio
1999

Lead Opinion

Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII, the United States District Court certified the question of “Whether an individual employee, not otherwise deemed to be an ‘employer’ under the statute, may be individually liable for alleged violations of the employment discrimination provisions of the Ohio Civil Rights Act, Ohio Rev.Code §§ 4112.01(A)(2), 4112.02(A) & 4112.99?”

Our response is in the affirmative. See Genaro v. Gent. Transport, Inc. (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 293, 703 N.E.2d 782.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.





Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I disagree with the majority for the reasons set out in the dissenting opinions in Genaro v. Cent. Transport, Inc. (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 293, 703 N.E.2d 782. I would hold that the General Assembly intended R.C. Chapter 4112 to impose liability only on employers, not on an employer’s managers or supervisors. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

Case Details

Case Name: Cheek v. Industrial Powder Coatings, Inc.
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 10, 1999
Citations: 84 Ohio St. 3d 534; 1999 WL 95029; No. 97-1962
Docket Number: No. 97-1962
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In