midpage

Cheatwood v. StateCheatwood v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 20, 1935
6 Div. 798.
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Anderson
PER CURIAM.

The finding by the Court of Appeals that the evidence shows only one continuous transaction is a finding of fact not reviewable on certiorari. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91.

The writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS, BROWN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Cheatwood v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jun 20, 1935
Citations: 162 So. 404; 230 Ala. 574; 1935 Ala. LEXIS 291; 6 Div. 798.
Docket Number: 6 Div. 798.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
Log In