Chavis v. GoordChavis v. Goord
At the conclusion of a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of making threats. That determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this
We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report, related documentation and hearing testimony (see Matter of Johnson v Goord, 40 AD3d 1335, 1336 [2007]). Furthermore, petitioner‘s persistent interruptions and uncooperative behavior during the hearing, despite warnings to cease such conduct, served as a sufficient basis for his removal from the hearing (see
Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.