History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chavers v. State
141 Fla. 470
Fla.
1940
Check Treatment

Under writ of error we review judgment of conviction of the offense denounced by Section 5469 R. G. S., 7654 C. G. L.

On the trial the State failed to meet the rule enunciated *Page 471 in the case of Stedman v. State, 80 Fla. 547, 86 So. 428, and in Fekany v. State, 121 Fla. 51, 163 So. 221.

The record shows that the child was an infant, about three weeks old living with its mother and her parents and the record fails to show that the child did not have what its necessities require.

This statute or proceeding thereunder may not be used as a substitute for civil proceedings to compel husband to contribute a reasonable part of his earnings toward the support of his family. See McBrayer v. State, 112 Fla. 451,150 So. 736.

The judgment should be, and is, reversed.

So ordered.

TERRELL, C. J., and THOMAS, J., concur.

WHITFIELD, P. J., concurs in opinion and judgment.

Justice BROWN and CHAPMAN not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Case Details

Case Name: Chavers v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Feb 2, 1940
Citation: 141 Fla. 470
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.