History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chase Watch Corp. v. Heins
259 A.D. 888
N.Y. App. Div.
1940
Check Treatment

Motion referred to the court that rendered the decision on the prior motion. Present —■ Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ. The motion is granted to the extent of amending the decision of this court handed down February 5, 1940 [258 App. Div. 1054], to read as follows: Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. [See 258 App. Div. 968.] The following question of law is certified as one which in our opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: Should the motion to vacate the execution issued against the person of the defendant have been granted? Order dated February 5, 1940, resettled accordingly. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Chase Watch Corp. v. Heins
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 6, 1940
Citation: 259 A.D. 888
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.