History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Cobbs
4 A.D.3d 383
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2004
|
Check Treatment

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated August 16, 2002, which, in effect, denied his motion to vacate and set aside the foreclosure sale.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly, in effect, denied the defendant’s motion to vacate and set aside the foreclosure sale. It is well settled that a foreclosure sale may be set aside when “ ‘fraud, collusion, mistake or misconduct casts suspicion on the fairness of the sale’ ” (Liberty Sav. Bank, FSB v Knab, 281 AD2d 602, 603 [2001], quoting Polish Natl. Alliance v White Eagle Hall Co., 98 AD2d 400, 407 [1983]). The defendant failed to establish that the sale should be vacated and set aside.

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved *384for appellate review or without merit. Santucci, J.E, S. Miller, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Cobbs
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 9, 2004
Citation: 4 A.D.3d 383
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.