History
  • No items yet
midpage
Charter Oak Life Insurance v. Sawyer
44 Wis. 387
Wis.
1878
Check Treatment
ByaN, O. J.

Insurance companies in other states are bound *388by statute to certain prescribed compliances, in order to authorize them to transact the business of insurance in this state. But compliance with that statute is not necessary to enable them to take securities in this state for debts due to them by residents of the state.

And if it ever were a doubtful question whether corporations of one state could maintain suits in another state, it is no longer so. Such suits are now supported by judicial decisions in all the states. It would be intolerable injustice if a creditor corporation in one state could not sue its debtor in another. Such corporations, denied judicial process against their debtors in the courts of the debtors’ domicile, might well exclaim, as Chancellor Keht, I think, once said: Quod genus hoe hom-inum? quaere huno tarn barbara, morem permittit patria? Hospitio prohibemur arenal.

By the Oourt. — The order of the court below is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Charter Oak Life Insurance v. Sawyer
Court Name: Wisconsin Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 15, 1878
Citation: 44 Wis. 387
Court Abbreviation: Wis.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.