Charney v. Cohen
95 N.J.L. 538
N.J.
1921
Check Treatment
Pee Cuejam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the-Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayzb, Trenchard, PARKER, Bergen, Kaliscit, KatzeNBAoh, White, Heppen-HEIMER, WILLIAMS,’ TAYLOR, GARDNER, AOKERSON, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.