History
  • No items yet
midpage
Charles v. Bishoff
1 Sadler 260
Pa.
1885
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The book was not offered in evidence as one of original entries. It was in connection with, and corroborative of, the parol evidence. It was properly received.

If the jury committed an error in returning a verdict for a sum greater than the evidence justified, the corrective power was in the court below. It was an error of fact, which we cannot correct here. There is no error in law.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Charles v. Bishoff
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 9, 1885
Citation: 1 Sadler 260
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.