History
  • No items yet
midpage
Charles Patterson, Jr. v. Con Med
16-6663
| 4th Cir. | Oct 4, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Dante Patterson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Rigatuso, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland; Jordan Vernon Watts, Jr., BALTIMORE COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Charles Dante Patterson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Patterson’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Con Med, No. 1:15-cv-03303-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Charles Patterson, Jr. v. Con Med
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 4, 2016
Docket Number: 16-6663
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.