History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chappell v. O'Brien
22 App. D.C. 190
D.C. Cir.
1903
Check Treatment
Mr. Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the court:

The motion to dismiss must be sustained. The orders entered are not final decrees disposing of the case. National Bank v. Smith, 156 U. S. 330, 333, 39 L. ed. 441, 442, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 358, and cases cited. Nor are they such interlocutory orders as are appealable under the act conferring jurisdiction upon this court. D. C. Code, § 226. It follows that both appeals must be dismissed, with costs; and it is so ordered.

Appeal dismissed.

A motion for a reargument was denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Chappell v. O'Brien
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Jun 3, 1903
Citation: 22 App. D.C. 190
Docket Number: No. 188
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.