History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chapman v. Stoneman
1883 Cal. LEXIS 507
Cal.
1883
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Myrick, J.

This is an application for a writ ¡irohibiting the governor of the State from proceeding with an investigation under the last clause of section 1, article x., of the Constitution.

We are of opinion that under the clause referred to the governor has authority and jurisdiction to proceed with the investigation sought to be arrested.

Application denied.

Thornton, J., Eoss, J., and McKjnstry, J., concurred.






Concurrence Opinion

Sharpstein, J.

I do not think that the proceedings which it is sought to have arrested are without or in excess of the jurisdiction of the governor, and I therefore concur in the denial of the writ of prohibition.

Case Details

Case Name: Chapman v. Stoneman
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 11, 1883
Citation: 1883 Cal. LEXIS 507
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.