History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chapman v. State
128 S.E. 819
Ga. Ct. App.
1925
Check Treatment
Luke, J.

There was evidence to authorize the verdict finding the accused guilty of robbery, and the conviction has the approval of the trial judge. When the charge of the court is read in its entirety and applied to the facts of the case, it is not subject to the several criticisms urged in the motion for a new trial. The rulings complained of as to the admissibility of evidence were not erroneous. The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodioorth, J., eoneur.

Case Details

Case Name: Chapman v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 14, 1925
Citation: 128 S.E. 819
Docket Number: 16486
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.