History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chapman v. Chapman
203 U.S. 586
SCOTUS
1906
Check Treatment

*586In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska.

*587Decided December 17, 1906. Mr. William E. Gantt and Mr. Herbert L. Baker for plaintiff in error. Mr. E. F. Colladay, Mr. J. W. Woodrough and Mr. W. F. Gurley for defendant in error. Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Haseltine v. Central Bank, 183 U. S. 130; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173.

Case Details

Case Name: Chapman v. Chapman
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Dec 17, 1906
Citation: 203 U.S. 586
Docket Number: No. 239
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.