15 Utah 434 | Utah | 1897
This was a proceeding to obtain an injunction against the defendants to restrain them from collecting a certain assessment which had been levied upon the capital
The appellants contend that the assessment in controversy herein is invalid, and that its collection should be enjoined, because, as they claim, it was made by a usurping board of directors. The question whether the directors w'ho levied the assessment constituted the lawful board of the defendant company was presented in the case of Coit v. Freed, 15 Utah 426. That is the action above referred to as pending when this suit was brought. We there held that they constituted the lawful board, and for our opinion on this point we refer to that case. The assessment, therefore, having been made by a board de jure, and there being no question raised as to any irregularity in the levy, or any want of authority on the part of a lawful board to make the levy, it must be held valid. Hence the court was justified in denying the injunction and dismissing the action. We perceive no error in the record. The judgment is affirmed.