History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chandler v. Atlantic Scrap & Processing
367 N.C. 160
N.C.
2013
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in Mehaffey v. Burger King,_N.C._, _ S.E.2d __ (2013) (No. 24PA12), the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed as to the matter on appeal to this Court, and this case is remanded to that court for further remand to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings not inconsistent with Mehaffey.

*161Justice BEASLEY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.






Dissenting Opinion

Justice NEWBY

dissents for the reasons stated in his opinion in Mehaffey v. Burger King,_N.C._,__S.E.2d_(2013).

Case Details

Case Name: Chandler v. Atlantic Scrap & Processing
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Nov 8, 2013
Citation: 367 N.C. 160
Docket Number: 35PA12
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.