*1 160 IN THE SUPREME COURT
CHANDLER v. AXL. SCRAP & PROCESSING (2013)] N.C. 160
[367
quеstions
conclude that the
originally
controversy
in
bеtween the
parties
longer
are no
at
aрpeal
issue and that this
express
is moot. We
oрinion
no
legislation
on the
now
questions
in effect bеcause
of its
constitutionality are
407,
not before us. Id. at
We dismiss this as moot ex mero motu and vacate the opiniоn Appeals. of the Court of This case is remandеd to the Court Appeals of with instructions July to vacate the 18 2011 order of Superior Court, County. Wake
APPEAL MOOT; DISMISSEDAS COURTOF APPEALSOPINION VACATED;AND REMANDED. by
CONNIE CHANDLER, Emplоyee, CELESTE M. HARRIS v. her Guardian ad Litem, ATLANTIC SCRAP & LIBERTY PROCESSING, MUTUAL INSURANCE Employee, Carrier COMPANY,
Nо. 35PA12 (Filed 2013) 8 November discretionary On pursuant review to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31of a unani- mous decision of Appeals,_N.C. the Court of App._, 720 S.E.2d 745 (2011), affirming in part, reversing part, in and remanding an оpinion and award filed on February by 25 2010 the North Carolinа Industrial Commission, by as amended by an order filed the Februаry Commission on 7 2011. Heard in Supreme the Court on 14 Novembеr 2012. Walden,
Walden & by Daniel S. Margaret Walden and D. Walden, plaintiff-appellee. for
Hedrick Gardner Kincheloe & Garofalo, LLP, by M. Duane Jones, defendant-appellants. for
PER CURIAM. For the reasons stated in Mehaffey Burger v. King,_N.C._, _ __ (2013) (No. S.E.2d 24PA12), the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed as to appeal the matter on Court, to this and this case is remanded to that court for further remand to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings not Mehaffey. inconsistent with 161 THE SUPREME COURT
IN v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY TYNDALL
[367 N.C. [161] *2 (2013)] in оr deci- participate not the consideration BEASLEYdid Justice this case. sion of REMANDED.
AFFIRMEDAND in opinion in his the reasons stated NEWBYdissents for Justice King,_N.C._,__S.E.2d_(2013). Mehaffey Burger v. v. FORD COM ad Litem for CHE-VAL BATTS MOTOR TYNDALL,
AMOS as Guardian ORTIZ RIOS PANY ALEJANDRO and No. 415PA12 2013) (Filed 8 November pursuant 7A-32(b) to reviеw § writ of to N.C.G.S. On certiorari dismissing 2012 by Appeals August on entered the Court of 28 orders denying Company’sappeаl from and defendant Ford Motor defendant to an petition for writ of certiorari review Company’s Mоtor Ford by Judge entered denying motion to dismiss this defendant’s order County. Superior Court, January 2012 in Nash H. Lock on 25 Thomаs Supreme Court on 15 October 2013. in the Heard Tessenеr; & PLLC, Hoyt Langdon Jones, by & G. Martin vice, M. Emison, by Emison, pro and Jessica Kent hac J. Rice, Sandridge & pro vice; Carlyle Agnelly, hac and Womble Millen, Pressly M. Mitchell, Jr. and PLLC, by Burley B. for plaintiff-appellee. LLP, and by Adam H. Chames
Kilpatrick & Townsend Stockton Dorsett, & Smith, Anderson, Blount, Mitchell Dietz; D. Riсhard Christopher Kiger; R. Jemigan L.L.P., by Kirk Warner and G. pro vice, Wise, LLP, by Robert L. hac and Brooke
and Bowman Company. defendant-appellant Motor Ford for Jr., Kyre, Brown, PLLC, by Kenneth Kyre & Pinto Coates for Attorneys and North North Carolina Association of Defense Chamber, amici curiae. Carolina Lumish, pro vice, and P.A., by Wendy F. hac Fields,
Carlton Moore pro vice; and Smith Rodriguez, hac Alina Alonso Liability Berkelhammer, Product LLP, by Jon Leatherwood for Advisory Council, amicus curiae.